FusionAuth
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Pricing
    • Contact us
    • Docs
    • Login

    Editing user data in the UI

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Q&A
    user data user interface
    3
    16
    5.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • danD
      dan @brad
      last edited by

      @brad Hi Brad,

      Thanks for the feedback. I hear your frustration.

      One note of clarification: in the admin UI, you can edit the first name field, but that field exists on the user editing form, not the registration editing form.

      Here's more documentation about that.

      If that doesn't work for you, then I'm afraid there are two options:

      • build your own UI, as I mentioned above
      • find a different product. We'll be sorry to see you go, but understand FusionAuth doesn't work for everyone

      --
      FusionAuth - Auth for devs, built by devs.
      https://fusionauth.io

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        brad
        last edited by

        @dan This is the main point of my argument. The field does NOT appear on the user editing form, but it obviously should:

        CleanShot 2023-10-23 at 10.33.38@2x.png

        danD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • danD
          dan @brad
          last edited by

          @brad Hmmm. That's a bit weird, as I see it in my instance on both the add and edit user screens in a sample FusionAuth instance. I can see why that would be a suboptimal experience. 🙂

          Edit screen:

          Screenshot 2023-10-23 at 2.37.35 PM.png

          Add screen:

          Screenshot 2023-10-23 at 2.37.18 PM.png

          A few questions for you.

          What version of FusionAuth are you running?

          If you download and install FusionAuth locally, do you see the first name field?

          Where are you running this instance of FusionAuth?

          What browser are you using (and do you see the same behavior from all browsers)?

          Is the field in the HTML and hidden or not present in the HTML?

          Thanks.

          --
          FusionAuth - Auth for devs, built by devs.
          https://fusionauth.io

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            brad
            last edited by

            I'm running v1.47.1. It's installed on a Ubuntu 22 server from your Debian package. I'm using Chrome, but the field is not present at all in the HTML, so the browser wouldn't matter. I haven't installed it locally, but I'm not sure what that would prove. The field shows up for you, so clearly it's supposed to be there. Perhaps the issue is specific to the Debian package. Everything else works fine, so I assume it was some oversight during the build process.

            CleanShot 2023-10-24 at 11.08.08@2x.png

            danD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • danD
              dan @brad
              last edited by

              @brad Gotcha. That is bizarre behavior. But I just installed the debian package on a VM with mysql and can replicate. I filed a bug, and you can follow it.

              --
              FusionAuth - Auth for devs, built by devs.
              https://fusionauth.io

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                brad
                last edited by

                @dan Thank you!

                danD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • danD
                  dan @brad
                  last edited by

                  @brad This is slated to be fixed in 1.49, the next release. More details in the GH issue.

                  --
                  FusionAuth - Auth for devs, built by devs.
                  https://fusionauth.io

                  B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • B
                    brad @dan
                    last edited by brad

                    @dan I'm now on 1.53.2, but the First Name field still doesn't appear on the User Profile form. I noticed in the Github issue, they wrote:

                    We are naming the user.firstName field [Admin Registration : first name instead of [Admin User] first name so when we go build the default form we don't find a result because we look up the field with WHERE name = '[Admin User] first name'.

                    Therefore, I changed the field name in Customizations->Form Fields to [Admin User] first name.

                    Next, I edited the form and added the field. However, when I try to save the form, it says:

                    To modify a form that is currently in use must activate the Reactor with a valid license key.

                    When I navigate to the Reactor page, it shows that it's licensed with a Community Edition license.

                    danD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • danD
                      dan @brad
                      last edited by

                      When I navigate to the Reactor page, it shows that it's licensed with a Community Edition license.

                      Custom form fields require a starter license, and because you modified the form field names, FusionAuth thinks you are trying to use a custom form field. (Note, I'm not suggesting you buy a license--this functionality should work in community edition--but I wanted to explain why you are getting the message.)

                      With the move to 1.53.2 did you upgrade or use a new instance? If the former, does the issue still appear in a new install?

                      --
                      FusionAuth - Auth for devs, built by devs.
                      https://fusionauth.io

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        brad
                        last edited by

                        I upgraded. I haven't tried a new install nor do I want to. I understand why it's happening. Is it something you can fix in a future update, without my having to start over with a whole new install?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post