FusionAuth
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Pricing
    • Contact us
    • Docs
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. zaalbarxx
    3. Topics
    Z
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 4
    • Posts 7
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Topics created by zaalbarxx

    • Z

      Unsolved E-mail template macros

      Q&A
      • • • zaalbarxx
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      409
      Views

      mark.robustelliM

      @zaalbarxx Currently, FusionAuth does not support the use of macros for reusing content across different email templates. There is an
      open issue on GitHub discussing this feature. I suggest you up vote it.

    • Z

      Unsolved Login stopped working - `missing_code` error using SDK

      Q&A
      • sdk login • • zaalbarxx
      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      1.3k
      Views

      Z

      @Alex-Patterson No, I've been using 1.50.1 version of FusionAuth (read from the admin panel) all the time. The only thing that changed was provider version. Like I said I can just switch between versions and it will start/stop working immediately, so I assume that version 0.1.106 may add some implicit parameter which changes something.
      I just checked it after using docker-compose down -v and docker-compose up (fresh installation) and after running the Terraform the error still persists. What's interesting is that I've checked the diff between 0.1.105 and 0.1.106 on FusionAuth Terraform repo https://github.com/FusionAuth/terraform-provider-fusionauth/compare/v0.1.105...v0.1.106 and it does not seem that anything that could be related was changed there, maybe it is related to Go client or something ?

      EDIT:
      Ok, I found the culprit, looks like between 0.1.105 and 0.1.106 there is some change that automatically sets this to either false (106) or true (105):

      Application -> Scopes -> Provided Scopes
      Here there are some default scopes, address, email, phone and profile.

      The problem here is that it looks like the Terraform provider currently does not allow to set these variables in schema, so basically we are blocked between older version with unsupported configurations like theme's oauth_consent and newer version which handles these scopes inproperly (we can change it manually, but obviously each deployment will cause the values to reset back to false).

      https://github.com/FusionAuth/terraform-provider-fusionauth/issues/277

      I hope this will get resolved quickly since right now it is quite a blocker.

    • Z

      Solved E-mail field not exists in access token

      Q&A
      • php token email laravel • • zaalbarxx
      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1.1k
      Views

      A

      @zaalbarxx sorry for the delay. I might be missing it (sorry not a PHP person) but I don't see where that confusion comes into play. I know that some of our docs had to get updated because of a change that we made during our 1.50 release that required to request further details in our scopes request.

      This release makes significant changes to the default behavior of new Applications with regard to scopes in OAuth workflows. The database migration will update existing Applications to behave in a backwards compatible manner. See the OAuth Scopes documentation for more information, in particular the Relationship, Unknown scope policy, and Scope handling policy configurations.

      https://fusionauth.io/docs/release-notes/#version-1-50-0

      Let me know if that still isn't making sense, or if there is a spot you were hung up on and I would be happy to update our docs. Or even better feel free to add a PR.

    • Z

      API Keys page 500

      Comments & Feedback
      • • • zaalbarxx
      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      3.9k
      Views

      Z

      @dan Yes, it works as temporary solution. Thanks!